🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.