🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.